MEPX
Chapter 7 of 10All chapters

Chapter 7 of 10

Formal fallacies

Invalid shapes that feel valid.

The main pair

Affirming the consequent reads a conditional backwards. Denying the antecedent assumes that removing one cause removes the effect. Both survive because they sound reasonable.

  • Test by inventing a case where premises hold and the conclusion fails.
  • If you can build that case, the argument is invalid whatever the topic.

Undistributed middle

All cats are mammals, all dogs are mammals, therefore cats are dogs. Sharing a category does not connect two groups, though the pattern is common in political argument.