Chapter 7 of 10All chapters
Chapter 7 of 10
Formal fallacies
Invalid shapes that feel valid.
The main pair
Affirming the consequent reads a conditional backwards. Denying the antecedent assumes that removing one cause removes the effect. Both survive because they sound reasonable.
- Test by inventing a case where premises hold and the conclusion fails.
- If you can build that case, the argument is invalid whatever the topic.
Undistributed middle
All cats are mammals, all dogs are mammals, therefore cats are dogs. Sharing a category does not connect two groups, though the pattern is common in political argument.